I think we should bring back that thing everyone did in 2014 where you badly photoshop two characters from entirely different media together to look like they’re in love. This is my proposal for doc ock x glados please consider
id: a digital fullbody drawing of v1 from ultrakill, riding a rocket. they’re leaning back, stretching out their hands to keep balance. her wings are folded and she’s crouching. the background is black. end id
see i think what people get caught up in is going “oh this and that are fetish art……hey did you know x thing is a fetish…pretty crazy right…..this piece of art is actually a fetish for the artist……..” and like. see the problem is thinking that devalues the art. i don’t think something being a fetish or sexual in nature or whatever actually detracts from any meaning or emotional weight something could have. i don’t think “horny” is a worthless or meaningless emotion and i don’t see why exploring it in art is any different from “sadness” or “happiness” or “anger”. does that make sense? im just sayin we should examine why we view sexuality as inherently detracting/meaning less in art than other things
if we r talking about machines today i love looking at the insides of old transistor radios theyre like a junk drawer that someone used tetris skills to fit as many buttons wires and string inside. sometimes theyre like miniature towns too and its all packaged in box you can listen to sounds on isnt that incredible
ALT
ALT
ALT
ALT
ALT
ALT
I Draw Cats!!!
![[Hands you this]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51NFEExLFXL._AC_SX425_.jpg){kind=link}